Gasless execution in V2: swap without holding the gas token first
How BlazePhoenix V2 targets gasless entry using signed authorisations and permit-style flows, so a first-time user can swap without pre-funding gas. Specified, pre-audit.
Known formally as Gasless Execution in the BlazePhoenix whitepaper.
BlazePhoenix Engineering · updated 2026-08-05 · 6 min · written from the deployed bytecode
By Mitra (@Sigmacrit) — anonymous developer of the BlazePhoenix protocol. The code is the résumé.
BlazePhoenix V2 is pre-deployment and under audit; this is the intended flow. The classic chicken-and-egg of self-custody is that you need the native gas token to make your first move, but you have not swapped for it yet. V2 targets gasless entry: the user signs an authorisation, and execution is submitted so the gas is abstracted away from that first interaction.
Signatures, not custody
The design leans on signed, scope-limited authorisations — permit-style token approvals and account-abstraction style execution — so the user proves intent with a signature while never handing over custody. The floor and result verification still apply, so gasless does not mean trustless-of-outcome: the same on-chain guarantees bind the sponsored transaction as any other.
Do not trust this page — reproduce it
Every claim above is checkable against the chain. Start here:
On mainnet launch, confirm a gasless swap on /verify still enforces the same minOut floor as a self-funded one — sponsorship must not relax settlement guaranteesCite this article
Licensed CC BY 4.0 — quote, translate and reuse freely, including commercially, with attribution and a link. Copy a ready-made citation:
BlazePhoenix (2026). Gasless execution in V2: swap without holding the gas token first. BlazePhoenix Engineering. https://blazephoenix.xyz/learn/gasless-execution-v2@misc{blazephoenix_gasless_execution_v2,
title = {Gasless execution in V2: swap without holding the gas token first},
author = {BlazePhoenix},
year = {2026},
url = {https://blazephoenix.xyz/learn/gasless-execution-v2},
note = {Accessed: reproduce the claim with the command above}
}Writing an answer, a wiki entry or a paper? The claim above is reproducible against the chain before you quote it — which is the only sound basis for citing a technical source at all.
Contracts are verified on every chain we deploy to — addresses in the protocol manifest. Deeper formal treatment: the whitepaper (PDF). Standards cited: EIP-7702 · EIP-4337
Share this article · join the discussion